JBuilder 3.5 Linux performance

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Article #2790

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.api Previous Next

#2790

From: Martijn Bruns
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00

12 lines
1357 bytes

I tried running JBuilder 3.5 Foundation on my Linux box recently, and it
seems
to run quite smoothly, although I (only) have a PII-300 with 96 Megs.
The requirements on the webpage, however, says it needs at least 128
Megs.
Does anyone know if the standard, professional or enterprise editions
need
more RAM of CPU-power than the foundation?
I really would like to use these versions for corporate development, but
i don't know
whether they will work correctly on my machine.
(They're too expensive too just try and throw away!)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <38E46185.B15F5C03@uniware.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,5554fe87fdc9bdb7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
From: Martijn Bruns <martijn@uniware.nl>
Subject: JBuilder 3.5 Linux performance
Date: 2000/03/31
Message-ID: <38E46185.B15F5C03@uniware.nl>
X-Deja-AN: 604703744
Cache-Post-Path: newsreader1.wirehub.nl!unknown@ip195-86-48-241.dyn.wirehub.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: nl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wirehub.net
X-Trace: thor.wirehub.nl 954491144 39852 195.86.128.18 (31 Mar 2000 08:25:44 GMT)
Organization: Wirehub! Internet, The Netherlands
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b2 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Mar 2000 08:25:44 GMT
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api