🚀 go-pugleaf

Ernie:

Swing 1.0.2 came out a couple days after we RTM'd, but isn't very
different from Swing 1.0.1.  Since the two versions cannot be used
simultaneously, you'd just replace swingall.jar and be done with it. 
There aren't a lot of substabtial differences between the two versions
of Swing, so you'd have to decide if you like the bugs in 1.01 better
then the bugs in 1.02 <g>.

-Rich

Ernie Rael wrote:
> 
> The original post had two questions. Blakes response kind
> of answers one, it says you can keep up with changes.
> A more complete response like:
>   . Just replace the swingall.jar.
> or
>   . Swing is just a component of a release, so the
>     procedure is diferent......
> I don't want two separate palettes, one with swing01
> and the other with swing02. If jb2 doesn't include
> swing02,the best way to update is definitely material
> for the FAQ.
> 
> The first question, "which swing, 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2,is used",
> remains unanswered.
> 
> -ernie
> 
> On Wed, 06 May 1998 23:44:44 -0400, "Michael J. Rozlog"
> <rozm@email.msn.com> wrote:
> 
> >check out Blake Stone's response in the borland.public.jbuilder.ide
> >group with the tread of "Swing and JB2".
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >Matt Tucker wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anyone know what version of Swing JBuilder 2 is based on? Swing
> >> 1.02 was recently released with a lot of fixes... how will Inprise keep
> >> with the changes?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> -Matt Tucker

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=