🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api
Article #3120

Re: Different way to handle it...

#3120
From: Greg Hamer
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 00:00
76 lines
3397 bytes
The trouble with this approach is that the designer will find the swing classes
that jbuilder loaded for itself from swing 1.0.1 . If
you use the windows standard color scheme or can stand color clashing dialogs,
you can use swing 1.0.2 directly with Jbuilder.
All atha I have noticed missing from swing 1.0.2 that is in our version of swing
1.0.1 is the proper lookup of the windows system colors while
you are using the windows look & feel. Of course, I haven't tried everthing
yet,  but I did see improvements in the behaviour of JToobar and JtabbedPane
while in the designer when using swing 1.0.2.

Rich Wilkman wrote:

> Ernie:
>
> Okay, you can replace swingall.jar as I mentioned earlier (but that
> may have an effect on JBuilder) or...
>
> Stick 1.02 somewhere else and use the new library mechanism in JB 2.0,
> create a library for Swing 1.02.  Make sure that library is at the top
> of the list for the project (you can make it a default that way) and
> you'll use those classes first when you compile without running the
> risk of funky behaviour in JBuilder.
>
> -Rich
>
> Ernie Rael wrote:
> >
> > The original post had two questions. Blakes response kind
> > of answers one, it says you can keep up with changes.
> > A more complete response like:
> >   . Just replace the swingall.jar.
> > or
> >   . Swing is just a component of a release, so the
> >     procedure is diferent......
> > I don't want two separate palettes, one with swing01
> > and the other with swing02. If jb2 doesn't include
> > swing02,the best way to update is definitely material
> > for the FAQ.
> >
> > The first question, "which swing, 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2,is used",
> > remains unanswered.
> >
> > -ernie
> >
> > On Wed, 06 May 1998 23:44:44 -0400, "Michael J. Rozlog"
> > <rozm@email.msn.com> wrote:
> >
> > >check out Blake Stone's response in the borland.public.jbuilder.ide
> > >group with the tread of "Swing and JB2".
> > >
> > >Mike
> > >
> > >Matt Tucker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone know what version of Swing JBuilder 2 is based on? Swing
> > >> 1.02 was recently released with a lot of fixes... how will Inprise keep
> > >> with the changes?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >> -Matt Tucker
>
> --
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rich Wilkman
> Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> Borland JBuilder Team
>
> If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> it's mine and mine alone.
>
> Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID: <355A272E.B3036926@corp.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3550E55C.14796184@uiowa.edu> <35512E2C.4EF2EC8B@email.msn.com> <3551e7e2.633957953@forums.borland.com> <355332D8.95989F53@corp.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,77fa22c9eadffb32
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
From: Greg Hamer <ghamer@corp.borland.com>
Subject: Re: Different way to handle it...
Date: 1998/05/13
Message-ID: <355A272E.B3036926@corp.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 353025536
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3550E55C.14796184@uiowa.edu> <35512E2C.4EF2EC8B@email.msn.com> <3551e7e2.633957953@forums.borland.com> <355332D8.95989F53@corp.borland.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api