Re: XOR Problem

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Article #3383

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.api Previous Next

#3383

From: Daniel James
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 00:00

19 lines
1309 bytes

In article <34BEC887.F94C74@corp.borland.com>, Joe Nuxoll wrote:
> about 80% of JBuilder is in
> Java - and switching a JDK can mean certain death to some subsystems. 
> One bug fix in the JDK in one place can easily mean 10 new bugs
> elsewhere
>

All of which really begs us to ask the question: Do we really want to be 
distributing bytecode apps, which may or may not run depending on the 
JVM on the target machine?

With the greatest respect to JBuilder - which I think is a great tool - 
I'd rather distribute native code binaries. Of course, I'm building 
apps, not applets.

Cheers,
 Daniel James
 Daniel at sonadata.demon.co.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <VA.00000004.0d064007@barney.sonadata>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<34B9A616.D80B18CC@pobox.com> <34BA9F5D.E233F8C2@corp.borland.com> <34BD8CE8.E64766F0@pobox.com> <34BEC887.F94C74@corp.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,bc432a6086af130b
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
From: Daniel James <internet@nospam.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: XOR Problem
Date: 1998/01/18
Message-ID: <VA.00000004.0d064007@barney.sonadata>
X-Deja-AN: 317183434
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <34B9A616.D80B18CC@pobox.com> <34BA9F5D.E233F8C2@corp.borland.com> <34BD8CE8.E64766F0@pobox.com> <34BEC887.F94C74@corp.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Sonadata Limited
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: internet@nospam.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Reply to Parent Message