Re: Updating version of JDK used with JBuilder

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Article #3472

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.api Previous Next

#3472

From: Andrew Bennett
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00

22 lines
1304 bytes



Dickon Field wrote:

> Hope this isn't a stupid question - can anyone advise me - are there any
> native code dependencies in the JDK supplied with JBuilder (which appears to
> be JDK1.1.2) which prevent its use with later versions of the JDK?
>
> If not, is there anything I should know about updating the JDK?

If you update the JDK, you are on your own.  Since a good portion of
JBuilder is written in Java, inserting a new VM may cause some of
that Java code to not function correctly.


Andrew
--
  Andrew Bennett            ->  abennett@borland.com
  JBuilder info             ->  http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/
  JBuilder newsgroups info  ->  http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/
**** Please don't post a reply AND send email.  Do one.  I'll see it. ****

Technical Details

Message-ID: <34A92DB4.7C1D8FB0@borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <68181q$mat4@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,db52e03b504a10f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
From: Andrew Bennett <abennett@borland.com>
Subject: Re: Updating version of JDK used with JBuilder
Date: 1997/12/30
Message-ID: <34A92DB4.7C1D8FB0@borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 311375372
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <68181q$mat4@forums.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: None
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Reply to Parent Message