🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api
Article #3492

Re: Updates/Patches

#3492
From: Phillip A. Lindsay
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:00
70 lines
3139 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------747D8B79B54F4F2008FE0D29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrew Bennett wrote:

> Derek Cribbs wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if anyone knows how borland is handling patches to fix
> > bugs and also how to update JDK in Jbuilder. It ships with JDK 1.1.3 and
> > JDK 1.1.5 is out now. How are they addressing these issues?
>
> We haven't announced anything yet.  When something is available, I'll
> post it in jbuilder.announce.  So, you may want to watch that group.
>

I couldn't help notice that the above says JBuilder ships JDK 1.1.3?  Is this
true?  Something newwith JBuilder C/S?  I sure hope to hear about a new JDK
update and JB patches,  and support
for servlets and fully IDE integrated ORB/RMI support with a transparent
Object to RDBMS mapping
tool....and of course enterprise bean support which is wired into Rational
Rose and all for $500. ;->
Well,  it is near Christmas!

> JDK 1.1.4 and 1.1.5 are just bug fixes above what we have.  As a result,
> integrating a new JDK would take a significant amount of QA effort to
> ensure that all the Java code we are using still works.  And if problems
> are found, research into those problems and the creation of a work
> around just lengthens the cycle.  Repeat until finished.
>
> As such, the code you create in JBuilder should run in 1.1.5 already,
> assuming 1.1.5 has no new bugs in it that break your code.
>

I know chasing the JDK's isn't an option,  but doesn't Javasoft give you
early/incremental access to JDK releases?   If as a licensee you get frequent
incremental point releases you would be in a better position to support many
of the JDK drops.....If they don't involve the licensees as I assume, shame on
Javasoft--Licensees in a tight process would help Javasoft get feedback sooner
and make Javasoft more responsive to the tool vendors.

-phil


--------------747D8B79B54F4F2008FE0D29
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Phillip Lindsay
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"

begin:          vcard
fn:             Phillip Lindsay
n:              Lindsay;Phillip
org:            Frijoles Software
adr:            8850 E. Fallsview Road;;;Anaheim Hills;CA;92808;USA
email;internet: plindsay@pacbell.net
title:          Consultant
tel;work:       714-280-9390
tel;fax:        714-280-9390
tel;home:       714-280-9390
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: TRUE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard


--------------747D8B79B54F4F2008FE0D29--
Technical Details
Message-ID: <348CE8AA.2D454133@pacbell.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3488DF0A.7D3C7BBE@aol.com> <348C4010.24C4467F@borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,c992e17528d743a5
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
From: "Phillip A. Lindsay" <plindsay@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Updates/Patches
Date: 1997/12/08
Message-ID: <348CE8AA.2D454133@pacbell.net>
X-Deja-AN: 296517130
References: <3488DF0A.7D3C7BBE@aol.com> <348C4010.24C4467F@borland.com>
Organization: Frijoles Software
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api