Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api
Article #467Re: best jdo implementation
From: Amir Pashazadeh
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:26
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:26
56 lines
2888 bytes
2888 bytes
Hi, which optional features of JDO does it support? there are 22 optional features in JDO 1.0 specification, I think most important difference between implementations (and to determine which one is better that the other one) is for support of standard optional features, optional features are: 1- Transient Transactional 2- Non-transactional Read 3- Non-transactional Write 4- Retain Values 5- Restore Values 6- Optimistic 7- Application Identity 8- Datastore Identity 9- Non-durable Identity 10- ArrayList 11- HashMap 12- HashTable 13- LinkedList 14- TreeList 15- TreeSet 16- Vector 17- Map 18- List 19- Array 20- Null Collection 21- Change Application Identity 22- JDOQL "Gerbrand van Dieijen" <gerbrand@twistedPUNTwarande.net> wrote in message news:slrnbkk71s.1sv.gerbrand@bellatrix.students.cs.uu.nl... > On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:45:20 +0330, Amir Pashazadeh wrote: > >Hi > >has anyone worked with JDO? > >which implementation is the best for managed environments (used in an J2EE > >application server)? > > > > I currently (am starting to) use JDO, with tjdo. It is quite easy to use > and install although you have to download a lot of packages for it. > It has its limits, but it free and open source. Since JDO is a standard it > should be relatively easy to switch to another jdo implementation. > tjdo is at: http://tjdo.sourceforge.net > > > -- > Gerbrand van Dieijen > > WWW: http://twisted.warande.net > ICQ: 19345450 > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bifg7r$8m0mj$1@ID-170682.news.uni-berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.165.108.56!not-for-mailReferences:
<bi8b13$6jo7s$1@ID-170682.news.uni-berlin.de> <slrnbkk71s.1sv.gerbrand@bellatrix.students.cs.uu.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107d46,e538346023077ec8 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d46,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,e538346023077ec8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,e538346023077ec8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public X-Google-Thread: f5e83,e538346023077ec8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public X-Google-Thread: f74b3,e538346023077ec8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-26 04:28:19 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.165.108.56!not-for-mail From: "Amir Pashazadeh" <pasha@abdnet.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api,borland.public.jbuilder.java.language,comp.lang.java.databases,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools Subject: Re: best jdo implementation Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:56:03 +0330 Lines: 58 Message-ID: <bifg7r$8m0mj$1@ID-170682.news.uni-berlin.de> References: <bi8b13$6jo7s$1@ID-170682.news.uni-berlin.de> <slrnbkk71s.1sv.gerbrand@bellatrix.students.cs.uu.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.165.108.56 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1061897298 9110227 213.165.108.56 (16 [170682]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000