Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #14472Re: JBuilder, how to define SUN jdk 1.2.1
From: Kobus du Toit
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00
68 lines
2890 bytes
2890 bytes
I mailed the people at JBuilder.com, we will see what they say. I am also waiting for it. Kobus Ronen wrote: > OK, > Is there a way I can get an evaluation version of JBuilder 3? > Ronen, > > Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com> wrote in message > news:37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com... > > According to Borland they solved the problem in JBuilder 3. What they > said was > > when JBuilder 2 came out the made it on the Sun spec and then Sun changed > the > > spec and that is why the thing with JBuilder 2 does work that well. I > read it a > > while ago on one of the news groups. > > > > Kobus > > > > Ronen wrote: > > > > > I am using JBuilder 2 and I have the same problem as mentioned below. > > > Is there anyway to solve this? > > > > > > Ronen, > > > > > > Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com> wrote in message > > > news:37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com... > > > > Are you using JBuilder 2 or 3, because I know JBuilder 2 gave that > problem > > > and I > > > > think Borland also talked about that a long time ago. > > > > > > > > Kobus > > > > > > > > zaf wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok with putting rt.jar in the path. Now some new problems: > > > > > > > > > > 1. jbuilder reports not finding the JIT compiler, and that it will > > > interpret > > > > > instead > > > > > 2. jbuilder reports not finding a debug version, so debugging is not > > > > > possible with jdk1.2.2 > > > > > > > > > > Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> wrote in message > > > > > news:uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no... > > > > > > "zaf" <zaf@hol.gr> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In project properties, a user can define a new JDK. The Java 2 > > > package > > > > > from > > > > > > > SUN does not include a classes.zip file (as stated in the > > > installation > > > > > > > instructions page it is not required any more), so the classes > field > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > JDK definition form cannot be filled. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, they're in \lib\rt.jar now. Put the path to that JAR into the > > > > > > classes field. > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37CE2A4C.8550BA2F@iname.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7q5jse$qoe2@forums.borland.com> <uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no> <7qdf7m$59o10@forums.borland.com> <37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com> <7qjapj$ck35@forums.borland.com> <37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com> <7ql7bi$eds5@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,21f824fec67692ba X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com> Subject: Re: JBuilder, how to define SUN jdk 1.2.1 Date: 1999/09/02 Message-ID: <37CE2A4C.8550BA2F@iname.com> X-Deja-AN: 520069633 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7q5jse$qoe2@forums.borland.com> <uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no> <7qdf7m$59o10@forums.borland.com> <37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com> <7qjapj$ck35@forums.borland.com> <37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com> <7ql7bi$eds5@forums.borland.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: battlezone@iname.com Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language