🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #14472

Re: JBuilder, how to define SUN jdk 1.2.1

#14472
From: Kobus du Toit
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00
68 lines
2890 bytes
I mailed the people at JBuilder.com, we will see what they say.  I am also
waiting for it.

Kobus

Ronen wrote:

> OK,
> Is there a way I can get an evaluation version of JBuilder 3?
> Ronen,
>
> Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com> wrote in message
> news:37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com...
> > According to Borland they solved the problem in JBuilder 3.  What they
> said was
> > when JBuilder 2 came out the made it on the Sun spec and then Sun changed
> the
> > spec and that is why the thing with JBuilder 2 does work that well.  I
> read it a
> > while ago on one of the news groups.
> >
> > Kobus
> >
> > Ronen wrote:
> >
> > > I am using JBuilder 2 and I have the same problem as mentioned below.
> > > Is there anyway to solve this?
> > >
> > > Ronen,
> > >
> > > Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com> wrote in message
> > > news:37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com...
> > > > Are you using JBuilder 2 or 3, because I know JBuilder 2 gave that
> problem
> > > and I
> > > > think Borland also talked about that a long time ago.
> > > >
> > > > Kobus
> > > >
> > > > zaf wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok with putting rt.jar in the path. Now some new problems:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. jbuilder reports not finding the JIT compiler, and that it will
> > > interpret
> > > > > instead
> > > > > 2. jbuilder reports not finding a debug version, so debugging is not
> > > > > possible with jdk1.2.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> wrote in message
> > > > > news:uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no...
> > > > > > "zaf" <zaf@hol.gr> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In project properties, a user can define a new JDK. The Java 2
> > > package
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > SUN does not include a classes.zip file (as stated in the
> > > installation
> > > > > > > instructions page it is not required any more), so the classes
> field
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > JDK definition form cannot be filled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, they're in \lib\rt.jar now. Put the path to that JAR into the
> > > > > > classes field.
> > > >
> >
Technical Details
Message-ID: <37CE2A4C.8550BA2F@iname.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <7q5jse$qoe2@forums.borland.com> <uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no> <7qdf7m$59o10@forums.borland.com> <37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com> <7qjapj$ck35@forums.borland.com> <37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com> <7ql7bi$eds5@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,21f824fec67692ba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Kobus du Toit <battlezone@iname.com>
Subject: Re: JBuilder, how to define SUN jdk 1.2.1
Date: 1999/09/02
Message-ID: <37CE2A4C.8550BA2F@iname.com>
X-Deja-AN: 520069633
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7q5jse$qoe2@forums.borland.com> <uk8qhxxpy.fsf@sds.no> <7qdf7m$59o10@forums.borland.com> <37CA4EB7.78C9BB31@iname.com> <7qjapj$ck35@forums.borland.com> <37CD41E5.5E34B6F@iname.com> <7ql7bi$eds5@forums.borland.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: battlezone@iname.com
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language