🚀 go-pugleaf

Ah, too easy. I checked that on forehand of course (only forgot to
mention it in the original posting). The execution log does not report
ANY errors. It shows the command line starting java, the feedback of
the JVM and that is it.

Please note that the project has executed correctly, it was only moved
to another directory location (the original copy still runs). After
tangoing with this problem for a while, a new project file was created
in an attempt to get it running again. That did not work.

We also moved it back to c:\projectname and the problem persisted. We
cleaned out all the *.class files and all the *.dependency files,
removed the project files and created a new project. No go.

The application does not use any additional library, all the classes
are available in the project's source tree.

 



On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 07:56:25 -0700, Rich Wilkman
<rwilkman@inprise.com> wrote:

>Tom:
>
>Set the project to use the execution log, run it, and then look at the
>execution log (View | Execution Log) to see the error.  A normal Java
>console does not hang around when it finishes, which means you'll never
>see any errors that may come up.
>
>-Rich
>
>Tom.Eugelink@OVSoftware.com wrote:
>> 
>> I've configured JBuilder to a project located on a network directory
>> "o:\projectname\username\project.jpr" and I've set the project's
>> source filepaths to this location.
>> 
>> All classes belonging to this project are found correctly and are
>> being compiled (from a virgin source tree: no class files, no
>> dependency files). But then the console window appears briefly,
>> showing the JVM starting and then it closes again.
>> 
>> This behaviour was also found in other projects...
>> 
>> Tom
>
>-- 
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Rich Wilkman
>Quality Assurance Manager
>Borland JBuilder Team
>
>If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
>it's mine and mine alone.
>
>Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
>be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
>a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=