Re: Illogical constructor behaviour?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #15023

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#15023

From: Tom Davies
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:00

6 lines
855 bytes

I think of it this way: while the base class constructor is being
executed the instance is not yet a fully fledged instance of the derived
class, and so anything in the base class constructor which relies on a
derived class being in a known state is dangerous.

Tom

Technical Details

Message-ID: <378A8BEE.83913F66@smartchat.net.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3789a7ea.1163072@forums.inprise.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,c150801d0979e255
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Tom Davies <tom@smartchat.net.au>
Subject: Re: Illogical constructor behaviour?
Date: 1999/07/13
Message-ID: <378A8BEE.83913F66@smartchat.net.au>
X-Deja-AN: 500103954
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3789a7ea.1163072@forums.inprise.com>
To: Tom.Eugelink@OVSoftware.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message