Re: Illogical constructor behaviour?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #15061

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#15061

From: Tom.Eugelink
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:00

12 lines
1101 bytes

Well, I still do believe that specifications are a easier to
change/influence than gravity. At least history tells us so: gravity
hasn't changed much over the last 10 years, while IT specifications...


I'll make some time to read the JLS.

>Well, that's kind of like disagreeing with gravity; it doesn't change
>the reality of how it applies.  ;-)
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Rich Wilkman
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Technical Details

Message-ID: <378d8af6.77269087@forums.inprise.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3789a7ea.1163072@forums.inprise.com> <uzp1241hv.fsf@sds.no> <378adee2.3105084@forums.inprise.com> <uhfn8aph8.fsf@sds.no> <378c7224.5379925@forums.inprise.com> <378CBAB6.3D01F347@inprise.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,c150801d0979e255
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Tom.Eugelink@OVSoftware.com
Subject: Re: Illogical constructor behaviour?
Date: 1999/07/15
Message-ID: <378d8af6.77269087@forums.inprise.com>
X-Deja-AN: 501242138
References: <3789a7ea.1163072@forums.inprise.com> <uzp1241hv.fsf@sds.no> <378adee2.3105084@forums.inprise.com> <uhfn8aph8.fsf@sds.no> <378c7224.5379925@forums.inprise.com> <378CBAB6.3D01F347@inprise.com>
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message