Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #15484Re: SQLJ support planned for JBuilder?
From: Eduard Pfarr
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00
23 lines
1562 bytes
1562 bytes
Max Polk schrieb: > In article <374EB34F.F26D1BA8@san.rr.com>, mmaculs1@san.rr.com says... > > Does anyone know if Borland plans to support SQLJ (embedded SQL support > > within java) in a future release? .. > Simpleton question: May I ask what the purpose of SQLJ is when we have a > cross-platform relational database support with JDBC? Is it that you get > the object-relational support better? SQLJ binds the SQL statements to the database at compile time so it reports SQL syntax errors which otherwise you just get at runtime (not a good idea in large client/server apps). Personally I prefer JDBC though; although the prepared statement "?" parameter setting looks to be very error prone with large SQL statements! Aside that I'd be interested in the simple question: is a prepared JDBC SQL statement as fast as a bound one in SQLJ ? Mike's question is a good one still. I'd like to know this, too. :) Cheers, Eduard.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37524856.1805246B@innovations.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<374EB34F.F26D1BA8@san.rr.com> <MPG.11b92379ffc453e29896e8@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,9dcaf88cce060483 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Eduard Pfarr <Eduard.Pfarr@innovations.de> Subject: Re: SQLJ support planned for JBuilder? Date: 1999/05/31 Message-ID: <37524856.1805246B@innovations.de> X-Deja-AN: 484001066 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <374EB34F.F26D1BA8@san.rr.com> <MPG.11b92379ffc453e29896e8@forums.borland.com> X-Accept-Language: de,en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Innovations GmbH Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language