Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #15487Re: SQLJ support planned for JBuilder?
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00
11 lines
981 bytes
981 bytes
none@none.invalid (Max Polk) writes: > Simpleton question: May I ask what the purpose of SQLJ is when we have a > cross-platform relational database support with JDBC? Is it that you get > the object-relational support better? Perhaps people have grown so accustomed to embedded SQL that they expect any language they use to support it? :-) SQLJ gets turned into JDBC, IIRC - but is probably easier to someone used to using embedded SQL in e.g. C.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u1zfx5v9z.fsf@sds.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<374EB34F.F26D1BA8@san.rr.com> <MPG.11b92379ffc453e29896e8@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,9dcaf88cce060483 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> Subject: Re: SQLJ support planned for JBuilder? Date: 1999/05/31 Message-ID: <u1zfx5v9z.fsf@sds.no> X-Deja-AN: 484036457 Sender: towi@SDSA1761 References: <374EB34F.F26D1BA8@san.rr.com> <MPG.11b92379ffc453e29896e8@forums.borland.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language