Re: Sorry folks. Subject should be: JNI & BC++5.01

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #15576

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#15576

From: Dion Gillard
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00

17 lines
1301 bytes

[This followup was posted to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language and a 
copy was sent to the cited author.]

In article <37422A3E.1618DFA6@tanet.net>, yardley@tanet.net says...
|  Sorry folks.  The subject line should have read "JNI & BC++5.01".
|  
|  I've had a problem posting the earlier post to the newsgroup, so
|  I asked someone else to post it for me.  Evidently, he forgot to
|  include the subject line.
|  
|  Regardless, I sure could use a pointer or two on this one.
|  
|  Again, thanks in advance.
The problems I've seen are to do with no long long defined in BCC....try 
upgrading or providing your own definition.

dIon

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MPG.11b26da920878b09989685@news.ozemail.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7ht3fh$d0s16@forums.borland.com> <37422A3E.1618DFA6@tanet.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,9bf6b510e6d3235
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: dion@multitask.com.au (Dion Gillard)
Subject: Re: Sorry folks. Subject should be: JNI & BC++5.01
Date: 1999/05/23
Message-ID: <MPG.11b26da920878b09989685@news.ozemail.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 481116426
Distribution: world
References: <7ht3fh$d0s16@forums.borland.com> <37422A3E.1618DFA6@tanet.net>
X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 927449173 203.108.100.98 (Sun, 23 May 1999 18:46:13 EST)
Organization: Multitask Consulting
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 18:46:13 EST
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message