Re: JDK 1.2.1

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #15683

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#15683

From: Max Polk
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00

7 lines
873 bytes

In article <37320267.19815B14@mbari.org>, brian@mbari.org says...
> Jbuilder3 uses java2. However, you can set Jbuilder2 to compile using
> Java2. The catch is that Jbuilder's debugger requires Inprise's custom
> JVM to work. So, while you can compile with Java2 you can't debug.

JFC 1.1 is in "beta" support with JBuilder 2.01.  Will this "beta" 
support ever become JBuilder 2.02 (or 2.1)?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MPG.11a139b1abc2c7ac9896e0@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <372C8D4E.9F4E6482@tonynew.freeserve.co.uk> <37320267.19815B14@mbari.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,65c959e5b1b1e87f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: none@none.invalid (Max Polk)
Subject: Re: JDK 1.2.1
Date: 1999/05/10
Message-ID: <MPG.11a139b1abc2c7ac9896e0@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 476374136
References: <372C8D4E.9F4E6482@tonynew.freeserve.co.uk> <37320267.19815B14@mbari.org>
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message