Re: Let sleeping threads lie?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #15711

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#15711

From: Tad Frysinger
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:00

10 lines
968 bytes

In article <7g65lk$ksf4@forums.borland.com>, mlong@ecst.csuchico.edu 
says...
> Just an addendum to what Chris said on this subject.  It is not really
> advisable to us notify(), it can lead to deadlocks if no thread is ready to
> activate.  notifyAll() notify's all threads that the action has completed.
> For what it's worth.
> 
I'm interested in this - how can this lead to deadlocks?

Tad Frysinger (TeamB)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MPG.1193bc718db4ad7b9899d4@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<37261640.457FA257@sciatl.com> <37262022.3697507684@forums.borland.com> <37262668.3C79A815@sciatl.com> <7g65lk$ksf4@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,efa12c4b85d88a4c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: tfrysinger@earthlink.net (Tad Frysinger)
Subject: Re: Let sleeping threads lie?
Date: 1999/04/30
Message-ID: <MPG.1193bc718db4ad7b9899d4@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 472871100
References: <37261640.457FA257@sciatl.com> <37262022.3697507684@forums.borland.com> <37262668.3C79A815@sciatl.com> <7g65lk$ksf4@forums.borland.com>
Organization: Freezone Enterprises
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message