Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #15809Re: Wrapper classes
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
13 lines
1106 bytes
1106 bytes
Richard Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com> writes: > Come to think of it, I can't see what an OS gains from OOP. Usually > you want to tune the OS to the architecture. I believe NeXTStep/OpenStep/GNUStep/Rhapsody advocates would have some things to say about that... :-) Yes, you need to tune some things to the OS architecture, but large parts of what people usually call an OS (a superset of the comp. sci. definitions) are application-, presentation- and session-layer (to map things to the OSI model). These can benefit from an OO way of thinking - and not only programming.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<uhfqbitnw.fsf@sds.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3719EB9B.47F2F99A@swbell.net> <371B74D3.5DCE5661@hotmail.com> <371B8E07.865DC598@inprise.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,d7b7a7d4aee60f48 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> Subject: Re: Wrapper classes Date: 1999/04/20 Message-ID: <uhfqbitnw.fsf@sds.no> X-Deja-AN: 468639475 Sender: towi@SDSA1761 References: <3719EB9B.47F2F99A@swbell.net> <371B74D3.5DCE5661@hotmail.com> <371B8E07.865DC598@inprise.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language