🚀 go-pugleaf

You don't mention if you are most interested in run-time performance or
design-time performance.
JBuilder is a robust tool so it uses more memory than the simple
command-line JDK.  I have, however, been
very happy with using it as a development environment and feel it offers
functionality that justifies the hardware(memory and processor)
demands.  As for run-time, I haven't noticed that it makes Java classes
any more or less bloated than anybody else.  My experience is with J++
(don't like it), Cafe (good) and Visual Age (really like it but still
prefer JBuilder).



-- 
************ Contact Brian Lawler at: ********************
 Brian A. Lawler, Senior Consultant / Senior Instructor
 "Opinions expressed are merely my own and not my employers"
 Advanced Concepts Center, Lockheed Martin
 wk: Brian.A.Lawler@LMCO.COM   or  hm: bl@world.std.com
 web:  www.lmco.com/acc/   or  www.world.std.com/~bl
 wk: (703) 390-3333 x3466  or  hm: (303) 745-9155
 U.S. Mail:  #49, 1699 S. Trenton St, Denver, CO  80231
**********************************************************


Trajano Roberto wrote:
> 
> Pals,
> 
> I started with Delphi, moved to C++Builder and now I am contemplating to
> 
> start using JBuilder for developing database applications.
> Has anyone out there experimented with JBuilder and is satisfied with
> performance?
> Any feedback is welcome before I jump ship.
> 
> Thanks