🚀 go-pugleaf

I couldn't agree more. Especially as I'm now trying to get it to work with JDK
1.2! I'd definitely recommend using a tool which is less integrated with the JDK
version.

Brian J. Butler wrote:
> 
> I think the disappointment should be directed toward JBuilder and not
> Java.  In fact, if you spend a little time learning to use the
> "standard" command line tools provided in the JDK, you might find that
> it's easier than trying to fight with the IDE.
> 
> BJB
> D. wrote in message <36d024c5.8341400@news.karlsruhe.netsurf.de>...
> >On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 13:39:10 +1100, Trajano Roberto
> ><TrajanoRoberto@netscape.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Has anyone out there experimented with JBuilder and is satisfied
> with
> >>performance?
> >
> >I have used Delphi before and I am now a JAVA beginner using JBuilder
> >2 :
> >
> >I am very disappointed of JBuilder. It looks like it has been
> >programmed in JAVA and therefore it's SLOW, SLOW, SLOW. Then there
> are
> >some messed up dialog boxes, starting a project results in popping up
> >a DOS-box (indeed the JVM), some changes of the userinterface like
> >colors of panels or buttons are not changed with the project and
> >online help is also not offering the help you need.
> >
> >But who knows, maybe that bad program (it won prices) is even the
> best
> >thing you can get to create JAVA applications/applets - which would
> be
> >sad.
> >
> >I am dissapointed of JBuilder 2 and JAVA itself.
> >
> >D.
> >