Re: recommendations on JBuilder

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #16459

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#16459

From: Richard Ulrich
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00

24 lines
1231 bytes

Patrick,

If I understand you, JBuilder (and Java) is definitely NOT what you want. 
If you are familiar with C and/or C++, I would suggest Borland C-Builder
for developing Win 98 user interfaces.  JBuilder does not compile anything
except Java, and even that it only compiles to "byte code" which must run
from within an interpreter such as a web browser. 

Regards,
Richard Ulrich

Patrick Barao <barao@erols.com> wrote in article
<7avia9$4mc10@forums.borland.com>...
> I'm looking for a compiler where I can build executable code without the
aid
> of compiler aftwards.  I want to create User Interfaces in Windows 98
> environment.   Would you recommend JBuilder or another Language?
> 
> Also does JBuilder compile C or C++ code?
> 
> Thanks.   Patrick.
> 
> 
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01be5f9b$82da5970$ba3e9ad1@uai-4>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7avia9$4mc10@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,34dda7ca77081550
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Richard Ulrich" <rm_ulrich@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: recommendations on JBuilder
Date: 1999/02/24
Message-ID: <01be5f9b$82da5970$ba3e9ad1@uai-4>
X-Deja-AN: 447724899
References: <7avia9$4mc10@forums.borland.com>
Organization: Ulrich Associates, Inc.
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message