Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16487Re: Can Java bytecode be considered a programming language ?
From: Steve Schafer (TeamB)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00
15 lines
1087 bytes
1087 bytes
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 10:13:39 +0100, "Anders H." <ah@i-data.com> wrote: >I'm new to Java, so this question may be a bit stupid - but anyway - I meet >a person that told me that Java bytecode can be considered to be a >programming language. It could be considered to be a kind of assembly language for an imaginary hardware platform called the Java Virtual Machine. As assembly languages go, it's pretty simple. >But who would make programs directly in Java bytecode? Masochists, mostly. -Steve
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37ad3230.646959591@90.0.0.40>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7a94nf$47s7@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,fe4ea256a84732e X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: pandeng@telepath.com (Steve Schafer (TeamB)) Subject: Re: Can Java bytecode be considered a programming language ? Date: 1999/02/15 Message-ID: <37ad3230.646959591@90.0.0.40> X-Deja-AN: 444588597 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7a94nf$47s7@forums.borland.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: TeamB Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: pandeng@telepath.com Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language