🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16495

Re: Java v Visual Basic

#16495
From: McMalo
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00
28 lines
1560 bytes
improve in VB object model?
I would call Kathy Ireland or any other supermodel to fit
more in the definition of 'Object Oriented'.
Why?
Well any supermodel has 'built in inheritance'
(though they need somebody to complete the implementation)
VB doesn't have inheritance. :-)
Don't be fooled by Micro$oft statements.
It is true you can define classes, but it is just not the same

JAVA has inherintance. Not multiple one (as any supermodel)
but it has. And they use this stuff of interfaces to go around
this point.


Karl Thompson wrote in message <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>...
>
>I have a client that is moving from developing for a Unix platform to
>developing for Windows NT client. They are currently reviewing
>developer tools. Does anyone know of a current paper which discusses
>Visual Basic v6.0 (shortcomings <g>) v Java/JBuilder? I'm particularly
>interested in the langauge differences. The last I heard was that VB
>has improved it support for the OOP model. But I was wondering just
>how good that support is.
>
>Thanks,
>Karl
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7acd67$70819@forums.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,8ad356fef61c2066
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "McMalo" <McMalo@HotMail.com>
Subject: Re: Java v Visual Basic
Date: 1999/02/16
Message-ID: <7acd67$70819@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 445019523
References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language