Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16495Re: Java v Visual Basic
From: McMalo
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00
28 lines
1560 bytes
1560 bytes
improve in VB object model? I would call Kathy Ireland or any other supermodel to fit more in the definition of 'Object Oriented'. Why? Well any supermodel has 'built in inheritance' (though they need somebody to complete the implementation) VB doesn't have inheritance. :-) Don't be fooled by Micro$oft statements. It is true you can define classes, but it is just not the same JAVA has inherintance. Not multiple one (as any supermodel) but it has. And they use this stuff of interfaces to go around this point. Karl Thompson wrote in message <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>... > >I have a client that is moving from developing for a Unix platform to >developing for Windows NT client. They are currently reviewing >developer tools. Does anyone know of a current paper which discusses >Visual Basic v6.0 (shortcomings <g>) v Java/JBuilder? I'm particularly >interested in the langauge differences. The last I heard was that VB >has improved it support for the OOP model. But I was wondering just >how good that support is. > >Thanks, >Karl >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7acd67$70819@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,8ad356fef61c2066 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: "McMalo" <McMalo@HotMail.com> Subject: Re: Java v Visual Basic Date: 1999/02/16 Message-ID: <7acd67$70819@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 445019523 References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language