🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16539

Re: Java v Visual Basic

#16539
From: Vasudevan Srinivasan
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00
20 lines
1280 bytes
Hi,
dont know about any such paper, but there is one fundamental and
significant difference:
VB is object based model and for Windows only tool
Java is object oriented model and a x-platform programming tool

Vasu

Karl Thompson wrote:

> I have a client that is moving from developing for a Unix platform to
> developing for Windows NT client. They are currently reviewing
> developer tools. Does anyone know of a current paper which discusses
> Visual Basic v6.0 (shortcomings <g>) v Java/JBuilder? I'm particularly
> interested in the langauge differences. The last I heard was that VB
> has improved it support for the OOP model. But I was wondering just
> how good that support is.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36C1FF91.46629182@netrisk.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,8ad356fef61c2066
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Vasudevan Srinivasan <vasudevan@netrisk.com>
Subject: Re: Java v Visual Basic
Date: 1999/02/10
Message-ID: <36C1FF91.46629182@netrisk.com>
X-Deja-AN: 442970504
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>
To: Karl Thompson <karlt@pine-grove.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NetRisk Inc
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language