Re: Java v Visual Basic

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #16546

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#16546

From: Paul Flynn
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00

20 lines
1374 bytes

Concernig the OOP model of VB, check out this article
http://www.vb-zone.com/upload/free/features/vbpj/1999/mckinney/mckinney1.asp
#1
from the author of Hardcore Visual Basic.

Paul

Karl Thompson wrote in message <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>...
>
>I have a client that is moving from developing for a Unix platform to
>developing for Windows NT client. They are currently reviewing
>developer tools. Does anyone know of a current paper which discusses
>Visual Basic v6.0 (shortcomings <g>) v Java/JBuilder? I'm particularly
>interested in the langauge differences. The last I heard was that VB
>has improved it support for the OOP model. But I was wondering just
>how good that support is.
>
>Thanks,
>Karl
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7irw2.825$0p5.639@news.rdc1.md.home.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,8ad356fef61c2066
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Paul Flynn" <paulyflynn@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Java v Visual Basic
Date: 1999/02/11
Message-ID: <7irw2.825$0p5.639@news.rdc1.md.home.com>
X-Deja-AN: 443058409
References: <79sll4$dhn4@forums.borland.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news.rdc1.md.home.com 918700291 24.3.6.109 (Wed, 10 Feb 1999 18:31:31 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 18:31:31 PDT
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message