🚀 go-pugleaf

Peter,

yes exactly.
But the advantage from JavaBeans versus ActiveX is, that the component
architecture JavaBean profits from Java biggest advantage, the
cross-platform
compatibility.

Since i used the SSL feature just as an example, i have never used any
specific bean with it.
Maybe some URL's i have can help you.
The most important manufactures list their products on this pages.
I hope you have luck.

Here are the URL's:
http://www7.software.ibm.com/vad.nsf/data/Document2562
click on the links on the right side, to view the products from the month
you want

http://www.java.sun.com/100percent/latestlist.html

The last i can't remember and find anymore.

Thomas Heiss



Peter Immarco wrote:

> (Replied to sender and group).
>
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks, that is precisely what I needed.  I do use C++ and Visual Basic
> so it appears that JavaBeans are akin to OCX controls except they are
> used as classes instead of ActiveX (DLL's/servers).  Speaking of SSL, do
> you know where I would go to look for a top-quality JavaBean SSL?
>
> Thanks again,
> Peter.
>
> Thomas Heiss wrote:
>
> > Peter,
> >
> > JavaBeans are just java classes.
> > Nothing else more.
> > So cross-platform compatibility is given with JavaBeans too!
> >
> > The difference is, that they are components (like an JButton in
> > Swing).
> > Each component knows itself, how to act with the user.
> >
> > There are four columns, where JavaBeans are based on:
> > Instrospection / Reflection
> > Event Handling
> > Customization
> > Persistence
> >
>
> <snip>