Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16702JBuilder to stay?
From: Steve Guo
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00
3 lines
623 bytes
623 bytes
After Borland discontinued OWL, I hesitate to use any Borland/Inprise product including JBuilder? I am wondering how you guys feel? Thanks
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36A95DCD.89076CCA@sprintmail.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,b9cedcebc684c61,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Steve Guo <sguo@sprintmail.com> Subject: JBuilder to stay? Date: 1999/01/22 Message-ID: <36A95DCD.89076CCA@sprintmail.com> X-Deja-AN: 435873745 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language