Re: JBuilder to stay?

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #16704

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#16704

From: Paulo Mode
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:00

11 lines
1133 bytes

Since the generated code is pure java that is no problem... I would be
worried with Visual J++ from Microsoft...
I really think Borland (Inprise) made some big mistakes in the past, and I
understand your concern. But I still like Borland products , and for me
JBuilder is the best IDE for Java.

Steve Guo wrote in message <36A95DCD.89076CCA@sprintmail.com>...
>After Borland discontinued OWL, I hesitate to use any Borland/Inprise
>product including JBuilder? I am wondering how you guys feel?
>Thanks
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Betq2.527$Zm2.2086@news14.ispnews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <36A95DCD.89076CCA@sprintmail.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,b9cedcebc684c61
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Paulo Mode" <paulomode@usa.net>
Subject: Re: JBuilder to stay?
Date: 1999/01/23
Message-ID: <Betq2.527$Zm2.2086@news14.ispnews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 436143494
References: <36A95DCD.89076CCA@sprintmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Trace: news14.ispnews.com 917135393 206.161.15.121 (Sat, 23 Jan 1999 18:49:53 EDT)
Organization: ISPNews http://ispnews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 18:49:53 EDT
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message