🚀 go-pugleaf

Thanks for the help.

The 3rd party classes, i must use, seem to act up in 1.1.6 and greater.
For instance, when I call a certain method using the 1.1.6 jdk, the
function throws a NullPointerException during the execution, but when it
is run in a 1.1.5 jdk this does not seem to occur. I suppose the
exception handling was improved in 1.1.6 and the sloppy coding has
caught up with them.

The library is a piece of "Middleware" that allows access to a
enterprise Web Based EDMS. The actual function that is called in this
environment runs correctly and returns the appropriate information to
the Middleware method. The error occurs in a function called
.unMarshal(). I suspect that it is in some sort of socket clean up that
is occuring, since communication with the server is performed via
sockets.

Richard Wilkman wrote:
> 
> Tom:
> 
> You cannot change the version of the JDK that JBuilder is hosted upon,
> but you can switch the JDK used by your project when you run your
> App.  That's what JDK switching provides.
> 
> It's only for runtime.  If you have to debug, you have to go back to
> the JDK that JB is hosted on.  The UI Designer uses the same JDK.
> 
> Out of curiosity (and because I don't have fond memories of 1.1.5),
> what stops you from using this library with 1.1.6 or greater?  Class
> compatibility shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> -Rich
> 
> Tom Harden wrote:
> >
> > Because 3rd Party Java API issues, I may be forced to use the 1.5 JDK to
> > complete the project I'm currently involved with.
> >
> > Can one run the 1.5 JDK in JB 2.01?
> >
> > If so, how does one set it up with out destroying the JB IDE.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Tom Harden
> > Chief Technologist
> > Holsons Technologies, Inc.
> 
> --
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rich Wilkman
> Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> Borland JBuilder Team
> 
> If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> it's mine and mine alone.
> 
> Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=