Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16803Re: Java IDE shootout
From: kjc
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:00
60 lines
3494 bytes
3494 bytes
If you want a pure OOP invironment. Give Visual Age for Java a look. I started out using Visual Cafe 2.5a. Then after a couple of frustrating months switched to VAJ-2.0. Like anything else it has its pro/cons. The pros are that it is a pure OOP environment, it treats projects,packages,classes,methods as objects. The notion of a file is non existant in VAJ-2.0. I like this concept of not having to be concerned file organization. Incremental compilation. Compiles happen when the code is saved. and only the most recent snippet is compiled into the rest of the code. Class definitions can be edited independantly of the methods for the class respectively. It has built in version control. You can export source in several ways. As java files,as an VAJ-2.0 repository of as a Jar file. Exporting in repository for is especially nice if there are others developers using VAJ-2.0 in a team environment. The cons. VAJ-2.0 is tightly integrated with its own JDK. In this case JDK-1.1.6. Also IBM has not made any announcements concerning when JDK-1.2 will be supported. So. If developing against Java-2 is the priority. Then. you may want to consider one of the other environments. For myself. I would much rather have something stable than somthing new. My 4% Peter Immarco wrote in message <36A528F7.8021D42A@micron.net>... >Hello, > >I will be using BCB Builder Enterprise with Visibroker for an Internet >server application. But on the client side, if you want to work inside >the Internet Explorer/Netscape browsers, it seems that Java is the way >to go (comments welcome). The Visual Basic activer server page >(activeX) restricts you to Internet Explorer. From what I have seen >some people are succeeding in writing Java code that works successfully >between both browsers(?) > >Can anyone point me to a (reasonably) fair and comprehensive comparison >of the major Java Design Environments? If not, I would appreciate any >comments, good and bad, you can offer regarding the Jave IDE you work >with ,and others you may have worked with. > >The main contenders appear to be: > >Borland JBuilder >Microsoft J++ >IBM Visual Age >Symantec's Java Cafe. > >Thanks, >Peter. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7853ia$jnq$1@camel19.mindspring.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36A528F7.8021D42A@micron.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4581,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4581,public X-Google-Thread: 108bbb,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid108bbb,public X-Google-Thread: 114aa0,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid114aa0,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 100145,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid100145,public X-Google-Thread: f5e83,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public X-Google-Thread: f74b3,342922c1e8cc5a62 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: "kjc" <objectman@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Java IDE shootout Date: 1999/01/20 Message-ID: <7853ia$jnq$1@camel19.mindspring.com> X-Deja-AN: 434876013 References: <36A528F7.8021D42A@micron.net> X-Server-Date: 20 Jan 1999 17:25:30 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Objects In Motion Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.lang.java.corba,comp.lang.java,ibm.software.vajava.language,ibm.software.vajava.enterprise,microsoft.public.java.visualj++