Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16819Re: JDK1.2 with Jbuilder 2.0x.... maybe a solution ?.....
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00
22 lines
1413 bytes
1413 bytes
kmoffat@halcyon.com (Ken Moffat) writes: > This is a problem. I guess I wonder why everyone would not jump to > 1.2. - Not yet stable enough. - Too many APIs to sort out - esp. if you've already started to use JGL - Applet writers will want to focus on 1.1, which the latest browsers support fairly well. >Doesn't the jdc come with a plugin that makes all the new stuff > work with Netscape and Internet Explorer, and aren't the updates > enough to make it worthwhile. It works on IE and Explorer if you rewrite the HTML documents to use EMBED/OBJECT instead of APPLET. Opera 3.51 uses the plugin also for APPLET, the others will use the built-in VM. Also, the plugin doesn๏ฟฝt exist for all potentially interesting architectures. > What are the issues that would make someone not switch to 1.2? An aversion to featuritis. :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u90f6cjuo.fsf@sds.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77ipqh$sm21@forums.borland.com> <369D30C0.C9D81319@inprise.com> <369d3df1.11569764@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f74b3,2d1bf96e7f0453f4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> Subject: Re: JDK1.2 with Jbuilder 2.0x.... maybe a solution ?..... Date: 1999/01/14 Message-ID: <u90f6cjuo.fsf@sds.no> X-Deja-AN: 432470982 Sender: towi@SDSA1761 References: <77ipqh$sm21@forums.borland.com> <369D30C0.C9D81319@inprise.com> <369d3df1.11569764@forums.borland.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language