🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #17660

Re: Using JDK 1.2 Beta 4 with JBuilder 2

#17660
From: Jon Williams
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00
80 lines
3290 bytes
hi jbuilders

i'm still a little foggy on this,
i need the 2.01 update from inprise for $10.00
and presumably 2 or 3 days shipping, before
i can get the jdk1.2b4 to work in jbuilder c/s ??

how about making it available for download?
and while your at it, how about making it free?

thanks
jw




On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:13:28 -0700, Richard Wilkman
<rwilkman@inprise.com> wrote:

>No, you just need 2.01 to have it happen automaticly.  The solution
>and explanation have been posted quite a few times already...  here it
>is again.
>
>> === snip ==
>> Unfortunately JavaSoft changed quite a few things in JDK1.2beta4 that
>> had been consistent with every other JDK from 1.02 on.  As a result,
>> JBuilder cannot correctly determine the name of the JDK or the
>> classpath.  The former is a cosmetic problem, the latter just requires
>> manual intervention.
>>
>> Configure the JDK as you would normally, creating a new JDK and
>> specifying a path to JAVA.EXE.  Ignore the unusual name for now.
>> Manually edit the CLASSPATH for the new JDK so that it reads
>> "c:\jdk1.2beta4\jre\lib\rt.jar" adjusted for your installation
>> directory.  Press OK and wait for the dependancy files to be built.
>>
>> You can use this JDK without any difficulty, but you do get an unusual
>> name listed.  If you want to correct this, you can exit JBuilder and
>> manually edit the file c:\JBuilder2\bin\LIBRARY.INI by hand.  Replace
>> line with the offending name with the following:
>>
>> [JDK_java version "1.2beta4"]
>>
>> That should be enough to let you work with the beta.  We will have an
>> interim release of JBuilder available to address the problem for real
>> in
>> the not too distant future.
>>
>> - Blake Stone
>>   JBuilder R&D
>>   Inprise Corporation
>>
>
>Steven Liburd wrote:
>> 
>> You need v2.01 in order to get this to work properly - or so I've read (I
>> haven't gotten it yet).
>> 
>> ==steve
>> 
>> Daniel A. Nathan wrote:
>> 
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I have been trying to no avail to get JBuilder 2 to work with JDK 1.2
>> > Beta 4.
>> > Whenever I specify the Java.exe, I get a message that says Javacomp.exe
>> > is
>> > not present.
>> >
>> > Am I doing something seriously wrong here?  Any assistance to get me on
>> > the
>> > right track would be greatly appreciated.  Also, I would like to work
>> > with Java
>> > 3D through JBuilder 2.  Any ideas on what I need?
>> >
>> > Many thanks for your assistance.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Daniel
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36265897.43298984@news.supernews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <36224AC0.E0886E7@coventry.ac.uk> <36239C22.8C27C16E@mci.com> <3623D088.1DDE5CF3@inprise.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,9d79beeae7a65019
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: jw@digimax.com (Jon Williams)
Subject: Re: Using JDK 1.2 Beta 4 with JBuilder 2
Date: 1998/10/15
Message-ID: <36265897.43298984@news.supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 401467531
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36224AC0.E0886E7@coventry.ac.uk> <36239C22.8C27C16E@mci.com> <3623D088.1DDE5CF3@inprise.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
X-Trace: 908483005 HNWIFQHZB6E911841 usenet42.supernews.com
Organization: http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language