Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #17660Re: Using JDK 1.2 Beta 4 with JBuilder 2
From: Jon Williams
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00
80 lines
3290 bytes
3290 bytes
hi jbuilders i'm still a little foggy on this, i need the 2.01 update from inprise for $10.00 and presumably 2 or 3 days shipping, before i can get the jdk1.2b4 to work in jbuilder c/s ?? how about making it available for download? and while your at it, how about making it free? thanks jw On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:13:28 -0700, Richard Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com> wrote: >No, you just need 2.01 to have it happen automaticly. The solution >and explanation have been posted quite a few times already... here it >is again. > >> === snip == >> Unfortunately JavaSoft changed quite a few things in JDK1.2beta4 that >> had been consistent with every other JDK from 1.02 on. As a result, >> JBuilder cannot correctly determine the name of the JDK or the >> classpath. The former is a cosmetic problem, the latter just requires >> manual intervention. >> >> Configure the JDK as you would normally, creating a new JDK and >> specifying a path to JAVA.EXE. Ignore the unusual name for now. >> Manually edit the CLASSPATH for the new JDK so that it reads >> "c:\jdk1.2beta4\jre\lib\rt.jar" adjusted for your installation >> directory. Press OK and wait for the dependancy files to be built. >> >> You can use this JDK without any difficulty, but you do get an unusual >> name listed. If you want to correct this, you can exit JBuilder and >> manually edit the file c:\JBuilder2\bin\LIBRARY.INI by hand. Replace >> line with the offending name with the following: >> >> [JDK_java version "1.2beta4"] >> >> That should be enough to let you work with the beta. We will have an >> interim release of JBuilder available to address the problem for real >> in >> the not too distant future. >> >> - Blake Stone >> JBuilder R&D >> Inprise Corporation >> > >Steven Liburd wrote: >> >> You need v2.01 in order to get this to work properly - or so I've read (I >> haven't gotten it yet). >> >> ==steve >> >> Daniel A. Nathan wrote: >> >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > I have been trying to no avail to get JBuilder 2 to work with JDK 1.2 >> > Beta 4. >> > Whenever I specify the Java.exe, I get a message that says Javacomp.exe >> > is >> > not present. >> > >> > Am I doing something seriously wrong here? Any assistance to get me on >> > the >> > right track would be greatly appreciated. Also, I would like to work >> > with Java >> > 3D through JBuilder 2. Any ideas on what I need? >> > >> > Many thanks for your assistance. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Daniel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36265897.43298984@news.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36224AC0.E0886E7@coventry.ac.uk> <36239C22.8C27C16E@mci.com> <3623D088.1DDE5CF3@inprise.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,9d79beeae7a65019 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: jw@digimax.com (Jon Williams) Subject: Re: Using JDK 1.2 Beta 4 with JBuilder 2 Date: 1998/10/15 Message-ID: <36265897.43298984@news.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 401467531 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36224AC0.E0886E7@coventry.ac.uk> <36239C22.8C27C16E@mci.com> <3623D088.1DDE5CF3@inprise.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Trace: 908483005 HNWIFQHZB6E911841 usenet42.supernews.com Organization: http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language