Re: Double dispatching technique (Visitor pattern)

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #17864

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#17864

From: Edoardo Comar
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00

14 lines
968 bytes

Thanks for your reply.

>The signature of the method to
>be called was determined at compile time.

I now see this behavior as reasonable.

but the first time I experienced it was ... after I already used the double
dispatching with overloaded methods which accepted as arguments objects
which were not on an inheritance relationship ... so that time it worked as
I exepected !

bye,
Edo.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6tigk3$mpn15@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6sjh8m$eq419@forums.borland.com> <MPG.106681ecc7d3db84989695@forums.inprise.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,107ec690fdf39b4a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Edoardo Comar" <comar@tecnest.it>
Subject: Re: Double dispatching technique (Visitor pattern)
Date: 1998/09/14
Message-ID: <6tigk3$mpn15@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 390918254
References: <6sjh8m$eq419@forums.borland.com> <MPG.106681ecc7d3db84989695@forums.inprise.com>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message