🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi, Peter,

All i could say is the following: super() method u can use _ONLY_ in the
first line of method u 're writing. It's super.SomeMethod() that u can
use wherever u want. Actually, if u place super() as the first line, u
shouldn't get any error. But the thing u can try is to put not super();
, but super.MySubClass() since the expressions mean absolutely the same
thing: construct the class through theirs parent constructor.

Think, it might help, but think as well there might be some other
mistakes or slips of the fingers, such as enclosed parentheses, etc.
                                             
                                                 Acid Steve

Peter Jacobs wrote:
> 
> According to all the documentation I can find, the following code should
> work:
> 
>     public MySubClass(BufferedReader file, Session session) throws
> Exception {
> 
>         // MySubClass specific code cut for clarity
> 
>         super(file, session);
>     }
> 
> On first compilation JBuilder complained that the super class was
> lacking a default constructor; which is fair enough as that is the
> implicit first line of any sub-class constructor.  But it will not
> accept "super(file, session)" giving "Error (37): method required but
> value found" regardless of where in the code I place that line.  The
> matching constructor does exist and does work.
> 
> As an experiment I placed "super()" as the first line of the code - and
> got the same error for that line too: deep weirdness.
> 
> Am I missing something or is this a bug???
> 
> --
> Peter Jacobs
> Principal Software Engineer
> Computerised Document Control Ltd
> Email : peterj@docctrl.com
> WWW : http://www.docctrl.com