Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19216Lack of enumerated types
From: Peter Steele
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00
6 lines
823 bytes
823 bytes
One language feature that I already miss in Java is enumerated types. I've always used enumerated types, from Pascal to C to C++ and even in Visual Basic 5.0. They avoid having to use explicit numeric constants. Very very useful. I've found ways to fake it but it sure isn't as clean as an enumerated type. What do others do to get around this language omission?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6d233j$37c17@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,ff8748db1a68b7e0,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: "Peter Steele" <peter@ats-forest.com> Subject: Lack of enumerated types Date: 1998/02/25 Message-ID: <6d233j$37c17@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 328631861 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language