Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19399Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++
From: Tad Frysinger
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:00
13 lines
914 bytes
914 bytes
In article <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>, thomask@post2.tele.dk says... > Does anybody knows how Java is performing (in speed) compared to C++ ?? > > :-) > Thomas Kongstad > I always here the number 20 times slower tossed around. Haven't benchmarked it myself. JIT's may make that a bit faster, I am not sure. HotSpot (from Sun) is supposed to ship "shortly", and make this gap much, much narrower, for the targeted platforms.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,da8c28137c954f71 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: TFrysinger@aol.com (Tad Frysinger) Subject: Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++ Date: 1998/02/10 Message-ID: <MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 323941831 References: <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default> Organization: FreeZone Software Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language