🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19399

Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++

#19399
From: Tad Frysinger
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:00
13 lines
914 bytes
In article <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>, thomask@post2.tele.dk 
says...
> Does anybody knows how Java is performing (in speed) compared to C++ ??
> 
> :-)
> Thomas Kongstad
> 
I always here the number 20 times slower tossed around.  Haven't 
benchmarked it myself.  JIT's may make that a bit faster, I am not sure.

HotSpot (from Sun) is supposed to ship "shortly", and make this gap much, 
much narrower, for the targeted platforms.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,da8c28137c954f71
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: TFrysinger@aol.com (Tad Frysinger)
Subject: Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++
Date: 1998/02/10
Message-ID: <MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 323941831
References: <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>
Organization: FreeZone Software
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language