Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #19402

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#19402

From: Nathan Kirkham
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 00:00

20 lines
1248 bytes

Javaworld (http://www.javaworld.com/) had a comparison test between the two,
and there wasn't much in it between the two using a JIT.

Nathan

Tad Frysinger wrote:

> In article <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default>, thomask@post2.tele.dk
> says...
> > Does anybody knows how Java is performing (in speed) compared to C++ ??
> >
> > :-)
> > Thomas Kongstad
> >
> I always here the number 20 times slower tossed around.  Haven't
> benchmarked it myself.  JIT's may make that a bit faster, I am not sure.
>
> HotSpot (from Sun) is supposed to ship "shortly", and make this gap much,
> much narrower, for the targeted platforms.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <34E19652.AD92E4A7@NOSPAM.result2k.u-net.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default> <MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,da8c28137c954f71
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Nathan Kirkham <nathan@NOSPAM.result2k.u-net.com>
Subject: Re: Performance on Java (JBuilder) compared to C++
Date: 1998/02/11
Message-ID: <34E19652.AD92E4A7@NOSPAM.result2k.u-net.com>
X-Deja-AN: 324086130
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <01bd365c$7d4f92e0$4ab4efc2@default> <MPG.f4aac77a35f389198977b@forums.borland.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: None
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message