🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19411

Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?

#19411
From: Rich Wilkman
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00
66 lines
3132 bytes
Bryan:

There are so many permutations to inner classes (which I assume you've
surmised by reading the inner class spec) that everyone is a little
behind JavaSoft in getting them all.  This is one area where javac is
still ahead of the game.

Java will get MDI, in theory, as part of JDK 1.2.  No-one ever accused
Sun of having a clue when it came to program UI, so a couple million
end-developers will have to beat it into them.

Are you sure you aren't an escaped LISP programmer?  Cars and Cooders
in the code'll give you away ;-).

-Rich

Bryan E. Boone wrote:
> 
> After trying JBuilder again, maybe I was a little too harsh about the IDE.
> I happen to like it.
> (although I am a MDI fan and would rather see an MDI IDE)
> 
> I would use it if I could get it to compile my existing code.
> I guess I just got ticked off when it wouldn't compile .java
> like the JDK.
> 
> I think I read somewhere, "Standards are great.
> Everyone should have one" ;)
> 
> Rich Wilkman wrote in message <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com>...
> >Brian:
> >
> >It's on the way to the compiler team as soon as I wrap it up in a
> >parent class.  I'll assume that this is all living in a public class
> >for now.
> >
> >-Rich
> >
> >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >Rich Wilkman
> >Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
> >Borland JBuilder Team
> >
> >If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
> >it's mine and mine alone.
> >
> >Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
> >be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
> >a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
> >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID: <34D9FE18.D3BEDB7F@corp.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com> <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com> <34D6089D.B4317041@corp.borland.com> <6b81tu$6mj8@forums.borland.com> <34D7A910.68D10063@corp.borland.com> <6ba9qh$7nv2@forums.borland.com> <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com> <6bcim8$8p34@forums.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,a9c30db1a74f3eab
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: Rich Wilkman <rwilkman@corp.borland.com>
Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?
Date: 1998/02/05
Message-ID: <34D9FE18.D3BEDB7F@corp.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 322366932
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com> <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com> <34D6089D.B4317041@corp.borland.com> <6b81tu$6mj8@forums.borland.com> <34D7A910.68D10063@corp.borland.com> <6ba9qh$7nv2@forums.borland.com> <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com> <6bcim8$8p34@forums.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: None
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language