🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19413

Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?

#19413
From: Bryan E. Boone
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00
72 lines
3410 bytes
Back to the problem at hand...
Any idea when Borland will be up to par with the inner classes.
And for that matter, will I have to pay for the upgrade?

Rich Wilkman wrote in message <34D9FE18.D3BEDB7F@corp.borland.com>...
>Bryan:
>
>There are so many permutations to inner classes (which I assume you've
>surmised by reading the inner class spec) that everyone is a little
>behind JavaSoft in getting them all.  This is one area where javac is
>still ahead of the game.
>
>Java will get MDI, in theory, as part of JDK 1.2.  No-one ever accused
>Sun of having a clue when it came to program UI, so a couple million
>end-developers will have to beat it into them.
>
>Are you sure you aren't an escaped LISP programmer?  Cars and Cooders
>in the code'll give you away ;-).
>
>-Rich
>
>Bryan E. Boone wrote:
>>
>> After trying JBuilder again, maybe I was a little too harsh about the
IDE.
>> I happen to like it.
>> (although I am a MDI fan and would rather see an MDI IDE)
>>
>> I would use it if I could get it to compile my existing code.
>> I guess I just got ticked off when it wouldn't compile .java
>> like the JDK.
>>
>> I think I read somewhere, "Standards are great.
>> Everyone should have one" ;)
>>
>> Rich Wilkman wrote in message <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com>...
>> >Brian:
>> >
>> >It's on the way to the compiler team as soon as I wrap it up in a
>> >parent class.  I'll assume that this is all living in a public class
>> >for now.
>> >
>> >-Rich
>> >
>> >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> >Rich Wilkman
>> >Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
>> >Borland JBuilder Team
>> >
>> >If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
>> >it's mine and mine alone.
>> >
>> >Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
>> >be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
>> >a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
>> >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>--
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Rich Wilkman
>Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
>Borland JBuilder Team
>
>If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
>it's mine and mine alone.
>
>Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
>be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
>a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6bd90j$93c2@forums.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com> <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com> <34D6089D.B4317041@corp.borland.com> <6b81tu$6mj8@forums.borland.com> <34D7A910.68D10063@corp.borland.com> <6ba9qh$7nv2@forums.borland.com> <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com> <6bcim8$8p34@forums.borland.com> <34D9FE18.D3BEDB7F@corp.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,a9c30db1a74f3eab
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: "Bryan E. Boone" <sasbeb@wnt.sas.com>
Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 beta, can JBuilder use?
Date: 1998/02/05
Message-ID: <6bd90j$93c2@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 322417518
References: <6a3ok3$jhs7@forums.borland.com> <34CF6D8F.7445F6E8@borland.com> <34D10E62.F3FB574C@corp.borland.com> <6argvt$62v$1@newsbell.bellglobal.com> <34D24D5B.4841A5F8@corp.borland.com> <6b4uqc$5488@forums.borland.com> <34D6089D.B4317041@corp.borland.com> <6b81tu$6mj8@forums.borland.com> <34D7A910.68D10063@corp.borland.com> <6ba9qh$7nv2@forums.borland.com> <34D8FFB2.52E4F087@corp.borland.com> <6bcim8$8p34@forums.borland.com> <34D9FE18.D3BEDB7F@corp.borland.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: None
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language