Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #19583Re: Why such bad documentation?
From: Gilbert Padilla
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 00:00
21 lines
1322 bytes
1322 bytes
what I can tell you?.....I'm suffering the same thing!!! I love Delphi but I have lost my hair with Jbuilder!! Rich Morey wrote in message <68bvl6$q709@forums.borland.com>... >Hello! > >Is anyone besides me befuddled by Borland's choice to imitate the >terrible documentation implementation used by Microsoft in their >Visual Studio development suite in JBuilder? > >I had played around with Microsoft J++ and was so annoyed at >the documentation / help files. I had looked forward to using JBuilder >and having the documentation like Delphi -- where you click on a component >and get hot links to METHODS, PROPERTIES, etc.. >but this does not exsist in JBuilder either!! Did Sun make all these >companies write crappy documentation to frustrate all us programmer? > >Please reply -- I hope I'm not the only one who feels this way. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6ah8eb$qgd12@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<68bvl6$q709@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,28e21ec91ca50f4e X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: "Gilbert Padilla" <gmb0@flash.net> Subject: Re: Why such bad documentation? Date: 1998/01/25 Message-ID: <6ah8eb$qgd12@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 319372887 References: <68bvl6$q709@forums.borland.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Organization: GPM Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language