Re: JDK 1.1 Compiler differences

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Article #20046

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Previous Next

#20046

From: Andrew Bennett
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 00:00

19 lines
1043 bytes

On Wed, 05 Nov 1997 21:05:23 -0800, Lyle Thompson
<lylet@heliosoft.com> wrote:

>One where JBuilder seems to fall short is in complaining that
>"variable may not have been initialized", when in fact all
>branches do, in fact, set the variable.

If you send a small code sample that illustrates this, I'll pass it to
the developers.



Andrew
--
  Andrew Bennett            ->  abennett@borland.com
  JBuilder info             ->  http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/
  JBuilder newsgroups info  ->  http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/
**** Please don't post a reply AND send email.  Do one.  I'll see it. ****

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3461ffd0.3635427@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <34615013.CF025F90@heliosoft.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,47fae1d22c5dbac1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
From: abennett@borland.com (Andrew Bennett)
Subject: Re: JDK 1.1 Compiler differences
Date: 1997/11/06
Message-ID: <3461ffd0.3635427@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 287466066
References: <34615013.CF025F90@heliosoft.com>
Organization: None
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language

Reply to Parent Message