🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #626

Re: which is better dotNET or JavaApplet ?

#626
From: Alexey N. Solofnenko
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:06
27 lines
1988 bytes
If I am not mistaken, ASPX is a server side technology. Java analogs are 
JSPs and servlets. In both cases your ISP bandwidth will be the same. 
There are several reasons why your pages can be slow:
- ISP computers are busy or slow;
- generated pages are too big;
- your code works slow;
- your web site is not optimized to minimize server requests - you will 
need to add some HTTP headers to tell the browser (and maybe proxies) to 
cache some information and do not re-request it from your server. In 
modern browsers with JavaScript it is also possible to update small 
parts of the pages instead of reloading whole pages every time.

I hope it helps.

- Alexey.

Asking wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've designed some page with aspx by using Ms.Visual Studio.NET 2003 but it
> runs slowly because of bandwith of ISP at my country.
> 
> do you think, JavaApplet provides more stable and performance than dotNET ?
> 
> Thank you very much
> 
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <424eed21$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <424e3eef@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f74b3,7a773691c98bea87
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:06:11 -0800
From: "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <alexeys@inventigo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (Windows/20050325)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Subject: Re: which is better dotNET or JavaApplet ?
References: <424e3eef@newsgroups.borland.com>
In-Reply-To: <424e3eef@newsgroups.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.200.221.5
Message-ID: <424eed21$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1112468769 208.200.221.5 (2 Apr 2005 11:06:09 -0800)
Lines: 27
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail