🚀 go-pugleaf

dnoyeB <lamont_gilbert @ rigidsoftware.com> wrote:
> ARe you sure?  Without testing, I would assume you could because you are
> calling start on an object, not a thread.  It should if my thinnking is
> correct, simply create a new thread and assign it to that object.

> If you object is properly defined to extend Thread, then start is not just a
> method, but actually should "create" a thread for the object, right?

No.  Start causes a thread object to enter the running state.  It does
not create the thread object.

Creating thread objects uses the Thread constructor method, just like
all other objects.



-- 
Joi Ellis (TeamB)               http://www.teamb.com/
No direct email, please.
For best results, post on news server newsgroups.borland.com!
Newsgroup Info: http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html