Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #7705Re: Singleton Pattern: Use All Static Methods or Private Constructor?
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 07:58
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 07:58
9 lines
1150 bytes
1150 bytes
"Jack Frosch" <jackfrosch[NO SPAM]@mail.com> writes: > Approach #2 clearly meets the pattern description of the GoF, but I'm > wondering if there are any uniquely-Java reasons why approach #1 might be > preferable? Well, that approach is closer to the Utility pattern. For instance, it has the disadvantage that it cannot expose implementation of an interface.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ud78segdn.fsf@sds.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!netnews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!PeerFeed.KWeb.on.ca!dnewsReferences:
<3b128359$1_1@dnews>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,604521ee4b628609 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-29 01:04:02 PST Sender: towi@SDSA1761 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language Subject: Re: Singleton Pattern: Use All Static Methods or Private Constructor? References: <3b128359$1_1@dnews> From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> Date: 29 May 2001 09:58:12 +0200 Message-ID: <ud78segdn.fsf@sds.no> Lines: 9 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.105.4.252 X-Trace: dnews 991123090 139.105.4.252 (29 May 2001 00:58:10 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!netnews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!PeerFeed.KWeb.on.ca!dnews