🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3af6dd31$1_2@dnews>, John Pruitt <john@branchsoft.com>
writes
>Can someone please explain how a Java class replaces a C++ struct when it comes 
>to complex data structures.
>ie:
>  struct test {
>      int qType;
>      int qVers;
>      int qMem;
>      struct {
>            char sType;
>            char sDesc[17];
>            int    sValue;
>       } ss[10];
>       int qfinal;
>   };
>
>I've tried every way I can think of to use a class instead of a struct, 
>but can't find any way to define an array of [10] class "ss" within 
>class "test" and actually make it work the same as a stuct within a 
>struct does in C++.

 Try not to have nameless classes, though they can be used in some 
 contexts.   Try:

>  class Test { public:
>      int  qType;
>      int  qVers;
>      int  qMem;
>      class TPart { public:
>           char sType;
>           char sDesc[17];
>           int  sValue;
>           TPart(){ sValue=0; sType=0; sDesc[0]=0; };
>       };
>       TPart ss[10] = new TPart[10]();
>       int qfinal;
>  };

 If that doesn't work then declare TPart separately.
 Making everything public is not very Java-ish though.


-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses

       happy as a clam at high tide -. <_" .-._.-.