Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Article #16364Re: Operator precedence
From: MM
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 00:00
22 lines
1158 bytes
1158 bytes
----- Original Message -----
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no>
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Operator precedence
[snip]
:You cannot increment an increment expression: That is, "++i++" is
:either equivalent to "(++i)++" or "++(i++)", neither of which make
:sense.
Why not? I am asking the system to increment the *variable* i and then
increment it again. Whats the problem with that?
After all the function points have been crossed the value of i should be
equivalent to :
i+=2;
-MM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7bl4e5$35b15@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7bjhbh$23j5@forums.borland.com> <uogmatwur.fsf@sds.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f74b3,5de188e6c0bc95e3 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74b3,public From: "MM" <manu_mathew@geocities.com> Subject: Re: Operator precedence Date: 1999/03/04 Message-ID: <7bl4e5$35b15@forums.borland.com> X-Deja-AN: 451041695 References: <7bjhbh$23j5@forums.borland.com> <uogmatwur.fsf@sds.no> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.language