🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10438

Re: Swing w/ 1.1.6 vs higher JDK's

#10438
From: Rich Wilkman
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00
41 lines
2026 bytes
Jim:

Swing with 1.1.6 is most likely JFC 1.0 - 1.03 (classes in the com.sun
packages).  The best argument you could make is that those are dead code
threads.  No more fixes, ever.  Javasoft would like to forget the whole
mess ever happened.

Moving beyond 1.1.6 would probably mean moving to 1.1.8 and "real"
Swing.  A bit of work, but it gets you on a more modern code thread. 
However it doesn't look like there's gonna be a 1.1.9 (all the work is
really happening in the Java 2 space), and JB3 will get you there pretty
fast (and even has a tool to migrate your source).

-Rich

Jim Stoll wrote:
> 
> I'm embarking on a Swing project and currently have JB2 w/ JDK 1.1.6 -
> are there compelling reasons (justified by the extra$$ to purchase JB3)
> for using JDK 1.1.8 or 1.2 for Swing development?  (JB2, while
> upgradable to newer JDK's, will only support debugging on the JDK 1.1.6
> shipped w/ it, so it looks like it's JB2/1.1.6 or JB3...)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim Stoll

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Quality Assurance Manager
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID: <37F0DCE3.E52F7B56@inprise.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <37EFE2F0.64E18FEE@crtnet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,7c6371853924d7de
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: Rich Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com>
Subject: Re: Swing w/ 1.1.6 vs higher JDK's
Date: 1999/09/28
Message-ID: <37F0DCE3.E52F7B56@inprise.com>
X-Deja-AN: 530325121
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37EFE2F0.64E18FEE@crtnet.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing