Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10593Re: Swing & AWT
From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00
18 lines
1041 bytes
1041 bytes
"Karl Thompson" <KarlT@pine-grove.com> writes: > Is this ok to do? No. > If not, why not. AWT components are "peered", which means they have native "controls" they represent. In contrast, Swing components draw themselves onto the background of another peered component. As a result, AWT components will paint themselves on top of any Swing components, and will not obey Swing's slightly altered flow-of-control when it comes to events. The result can be chaos. > What about AWT and SWING in the same project but different forms? Should work - but why would you want to?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u671xbxof.fsf@sds.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7qbccg$3ft1@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,89dc45899ec387f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: Tor Iver Wilhelmsen <tor.wilhelmsen@sds.no> Subject: Re: Swing & AWT Date: 1999/08/30 Message-ID: <u671xbxof.fsf@sds.no> X-Deja-AN: 518767081 Sender: towi@SDSA1761 References: <7qbccg$3ft1@forums.borland.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing