Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10619Re: jfc/swing1.1.1
From: Joe Fessler
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00
26 lines
1543 bytes
1543 bytes
Is that the thing called Kestrel (the Swing 1.1.1 version for jdk 1.2)? Is it just me, or has the proliferation of versions done more to stall Java than anything MS could think up?! I'm so tired of being pulled in two directions... go with jdk 1.2 (a.k.a. Java 2) to get "these" bug fixes... no, stay with 1.1.8 so swing will work right. This is rhetorical, but why on earth would you spend resources to fix an extension (swing) to an old version of the jdk at the same time pushing a new jdk which won't work with the "fixed" swing? Just puzzled. Please post replies to group _and_ sender. --- Regards, Joe Tad Frysinger wrote: > I think you are out of luck. Swing 1.1.1 and the Swing that comes with > 1.2 are different, and not all compatible. You will have to wait for the > Swing in 1.2 JDK feature set to catch the 1.1.1 that is in the 1.1.8 jdk. > Tad Frysinger (TeamB)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37BDA919.FCE2B364@idir.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7omv8c$80k1@forums.borland.com> <37AF44CA.B46286E4@inprise.com> <7ooq1n$9d65@forums.borland.com> <MPG.12260e2f18d40c9398968a@forums.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,5f5daa78f4563821 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: Joe Fessler <jfessler@idir.net> Subject: Re: jfc/swing1.1.1 Date: 1999/08/20 Message-ID: <37BDA919.FCE2B364@idir.net> X-Deja-AN: 515222944 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7omv8c$80k1@forums.borland.com> <37AF44CA.B46286E4@inprise.com> <7ooq1n$9d65@forums.borland.com> <MPG.12260e2f18d40c9398968a@forums.borland.com> Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing