🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10762

Re: comparing various swingalls

#10762
From: Alex B. Humphreys
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
53 lines
3239 bytes
I'm using 1.1.x, so no worries there (and I have few problems requiring a
specific plug-in).  But why do I have to deploy (manually?) another swingall to
replace the one that comes with the plugin?  What's wrong with the one comes
with the plug-in?  Can't I somehow compile/test/run with that one only?

As for the Java-as-GUI thing, I think in an application Java can do some great
things.  Applets sure are a pain in the tail, though.

Thanks.
Alex

Joe Fessler wrote:

> In a word, yes... you were wrong.  Sorry to be so sour, but the swing/plugin
> has been a pain in my ass for quite some time.  As far as I can tell, the
> situation is this: different plugin versions do not cohabitate well and
> there is only long range evaluation efforts on Sun's radar screen - this
> includes plugin support for multiple JDK's on the same machine.  Next; the
> version of swing in jdk 1.2 seems to have much less capability and more bugs
> than the _beta_ versions of 1.1.x - particularly re: html components.  So if
> you want decent swing functionality, use 1.1.1, which seems to require JDK
> 1.1.7 or better, but NOT JDK 1.2.  That means you'll need plugin 1.1.x plus
> having to deploy (maybe manually) a swingall.jar to replace the one that
> comes with the plugin.  Of course, if the user already has plugin 1.2, then
> they will have to uninstall it first and then install 1.1.x.
>
> I hate to say it (and, _please_!!!!!, if someone has a solution to these
> problems, let the rest of us in on it), Java as a
> GUI client is breathing it's last.  The conspiracy theorist in me says that
> Sun is purposely making swing and client deployed apps/applets more
> difficult to build, since software on the client does not necessarily
> require server hardware - their bread and butter.  No, this is not intended
> as flame bait.
>
> ---
> Regards,
> -Joe
>
> Alex B. Humphreys wrote:
>
> > I've set my Jbuilder (2.01) to run using the jdk and swingall that come
> > with the Java Plug-In (so that when I deploy it is should be smooth
> > sailing).  But when I deploy it, I need to include a DIFFERENT swingall
> > (which is older) in the classpath or else I get a NoClassDefFound on
> > JApplet or Metal LookandFeel.  How can I compile my program so it
> > includes the necessary swing classes and can run with the installed Java
> > Plug-In swingall (rather than making people download a 2Mg swingall)?
> >
> > I'm aware that swing isn't the best solution on the web, but I had hoped
> > that the java plug-in would help to remedy the situation.  Was I wrong?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Alex
Technical Details
Message-ID: <37AF43F7.920EB9CE@sema4.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111d45,57f9e143274dfab
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public
From: "Alex B. Humphreys" <ahumphreys@sema4.com>
Subject: Re: comparing various swingalls
Date: 1999/08/09
Message-ID: <37AF43F7.920EB9CE@sema4.com>
X-Deja-AN: 510800634
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net>
To: Joe Fessler <jfessler@idir.net>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Semaphore, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing