Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10762Re: comparing various swingalls
From: Alex B. Humphreys
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
53 lines
3239 bytes
3239 bytes
I'm using 1.1.x, so no worries there (and I have few problems requiring a specific plug-in). But why do I have to deploy (manually?) another swingall to replace the one that comes with the plugin? What's wrong with the one comes with the plug-in? Can't I somehow compile/test/run with that one only? As for the Java-as-GUI thing, I think in an application Java can do some great things. Applets sure are a pain in the tail, though. Thanks. Alex Joe Fessler wrote: > In a word, yes... you were wrong. Sorry to be so sour, but the swing/plugin > has been a pain in my ass for quite some time. As far as I can tell, the > situation is this: different plugin versions do not cohabitate well and > there is only long range evaluation efforts on Sun's radar screen - this > includes plugin support for multiple JDK's on the same machine. Next; the > version of swing in jdk 1.2 seems to have much less capability and more bugs > than the _beta_ versions of 1.1.x - particularly re: html components. So if > you want decent swing functionality, use 1.1.1, which seems to require JDK > 1.1.7 or better, but NOT JDK 1.2. That means you'll need plugin 1.1.x plus > having to deploy (maybe manually) a swingall.jar to replace the one that > comes with the plugin. Of course, if the user already has plugin 1.2, then > they will have to uninstall it first and then install 1.1.x. > > I hate to say it (and, _please_!!!!!, if someone has a solution to these > problems, let the rest of us in on it), Java as a > GUI client is breathing it's last. The conspiracy theorist in me says that > Sun is purposely making swing and client deployed apps/applets more > difficult to build, since software on the client does not necessarily > require server hardware - their bread and butter. No, this is not intended > as flame bait. > > --- > Regards, > -Joe > > Alex B. Humphreys wrote: > > > I've set my Jbuilder (2.01) to run using the jdk and swingall that come > > with the Java Plug-In (so that when I deploy it is should be smooth > > sailing). But when I deploy it, I need to include a DIFFERENT swingall > > (which is older) in the classpath or else I get a NoClassDefFound on > > JApplet or Metal LookandFeel. How can I compile my program so it > > includes the necessary swing classes and can run with the installed Java > > Plug-In swingall (rather than making people download a 2Mg swingall)? > > > > I'm aware that swing isn't the best solution on the web, but I had hoped > > that the java plug-in would help to remedy the situation. Was I wrong? > > > > Thanks > > Alex
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37AF43F7.920EB9CE@sema4.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,57f9e143274dfab X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: "Alex B. Humphreys" <ahumphreys@sema4.com> Subject: Re: comparing various swingalls Date: 1999/08/09 Message-ID: <37AF43F7.920EB9CE@sema4.com> X-Deja-AN: 510800634 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net> To: Joe Fessler <jfessler@idir.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Semaphore, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing