Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing
Article #10860Re: comparing various swingalls
From: Rich Wilkman
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00
57 lines
2699 bytes
2699 bytes
Joe: No conspiracy here, but where we are today is the "logical" endpoint from where Applets started in pre 1.0 Java. The only big event that "broke" applets was the inability (or lack of desire) for the browser manufacturers to keep up. Sun did nothing to steer this back on course, so we are where we are today. Thank goodness that Applets are such a tiny part of Java! -Rich Joe Fessler wrote: > > > I hate to say it (and, _please_!!!!!, if someone has a solution to these > problems, let the rest of us in on it), Java as a > GUI client is breathing it's last. The conspiracy theorist in me says that > Sun is purposely making swing and client deployed apps/applets more > difficult to build, since software on the client does not necessarily > require server hardware - their bread and butter. No, this is not intended > as flame bait. > > --- > Regards, > -Joe > > Alex B. Humphreys wrote: > > > I've set my Jbuilder (2.01) to run using the jdk and swingall that come > > with the Java Plug-In (so that when I deploy it is should be smooth > > sailing). But when I deploy it, I need to include a DIFFERENT swingall > > (which is older) in the classpath or else I get a NoClassDefFound on > > JApplet or Metal LookandFeel. How can I compile my program so it > > includes the necessary swing classes and can run with the installed Java > > Plug-In swingall (rather than making people download a 2Mg swingall)? > > > > I'm aware that swing isn't the best solution on the web, but I had hoped > > that the java plug-in would help to remedy the situation. Was I wrong? > > > > Thanks > > Alex -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rich Wilkman Quality Assurance Manager Borland JBuilder Team If you see something that looks like an opinion up there, it's mine and mine alone. Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will be ignored. If I have time, I'll respond, but you have a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37AF43EC.E8204BDB@inprise.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d45,57f9e143274dfab X-Google-Attributes: gid111d45,public From: Rich Wilkman <rwilkman@inprise.com> Subject: Re: comparing various swingalls Date: 1999/08/09 Message-ID: <37AF43EC.E8204BDB@inprise.com> X-Deja-AN: 510800633 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37A9D848.2283A313@sema4.com> <37AF38C6.80D44FCD@idir.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.swing